The situation

Brand inconsistency isn’t usually a guidelines problem. It’s a capability problem. When teams lack internal production capacity, everything bottlenecks through external agencies. Cost goes up. Control goes down. Quality drifts.

One digital marketplace proved insourcing can solve this — but only when you build the operating model to support it. They reduced external spend by 400K € in the first wave, then exceeded savings expectations by 60% in the second wave by taking campaign creation fully in-house. Total savings: ~1 Mio € over three years.

Case Study

The Operating Model That Makes Insourcing Work

Problem

High external spend on design and production. Agency dependency. No internal capability. Every campaign, every asset, every execution routed through external partners. Slow. Expensive. No institutional knowledge building internally.

Build

  • Wave 1 — Foundation: Full cost analysis (what we spend, where, why), team hiring and role definition, creative operations structure (workflows, standards, processes)
  • Wave 2 — Creation takeover: Campaign creation fully in-house (B2B, B2C, employer branding). High-complexity production including TV spots and 360° campaigns

Outcome

  • ~400K € annual spend reduced
  • 60% above savings expectations
  • ~€1M total savings
  • Full internal capability built

The pattern

Insourcing fails when it’s just 'hire designers and hope.' It works when you build the operating model that makes internal execution sustainable.

This case worked because it happened in two waves. Wave 1 built the foundation: cost analysis (know what you’re replacing), team structure (roles defined), and creative operations (workflows that scale). Wave 2 took over execution: campaign creation, production capabilities, high-complexity work that previously only agencies could handle.

The critical insight: insourcing isn’t about replacing agencies with employees. It’s about building internal systems that reduce dependency, improve speed, and compound institutional knowledge. The cost savings are real — but the strategic value is control.

When this applies

  • External spend is high but quality and speed aren’t improving
  • Agency dependency is creating bottlenecks or knowledge loss
  • You’re scaling operations but capability isn’t keeping pace
  • Internal teams exist but lack the systems to execute independently
  • You want to build institutional knowledge rather than rent it

More cases

Need this kind of outcome in your context?
→ Let’s talk.

Chat with Kerstin Ask for relevant examples